Skip to main content

THE YOUNG MAJOR

The debate on media including social media on the action of a young major in Kashmir is unending. A large number of politicians, socialists, liberals, pseudo intellectuals and such like others have commented that the young man is guilty of using human shield to save his skin and colleagues. Some have even labelled it as an act of cowardice. Interestingly, everyone seems to know what a young major should not have done while encountering a hostile, offensive and armed crowd of over thousand people. A stone is also an arm when it is being or intended to be used as one. However, sadly, none of them has a clue or suggested an alternate course of action that was available to the officer to tackle the vexed situation he confronted and its contingent fallout.
   Here, there is an inherent problem. Illiterate and grossly unfit people know whether, when and how a doctor should operate. Masons and Mechanics know better designs of bridges than engineers. Street paddlers can give tips to an aircraft pilot. Of course everyone; Tom, Dick and Harry know how to govern the country. It is thus no wonder that those who are capable of wetting their pyjamas on hearing the sound of a gunshot are so vocal on human rights. People with combat experience limited to causing domestic violence have strategic plans to combat insurgencies.
   In an insurgency prone area where the Army has been deployed and Armed Forces Special Powers Act is in enforcement, the life is obviously not normal. The dilemma is very often to identify the lesser evil. The decisions have to be taken at the spur of the moment, under extreme mental and physical fatigue with exceptional moral and physical courage. Please appreciate the mental presence of the Army Major that everyone involved in the incident is alive today. The human rights of the dead are limited to decent and honourable burial. At macro level the insurgency may be economic, political, racial, ethnic or territorial dispute but for the man at ground zero, it is war.
  There is an old dictum, ‘Nothing succeeds like success’. This was a successful operation by all accounts where the officer managed to rescue all hostages without causing injury or damage to anyone including the hostile crowd. This itself vindicates the action of the officer. Secondly, the officer is answerable only to his immediate superior commander in particular and the organisation, in general. When the Army and no less than Chief of Army Staff has endorsed and lauded his action, others must applaud the officer. Therefore, all criticism hurled on the officer is null and void ab-initio as the commentators lack locus-standii and jurisdiction to express an opinion. The nation and its entire citizen can only be grateful to these young men and women who risk their lives no end, day in and day out for safe guarding and ensuring our peace and prosperity.

   Well done Indian Army, we are proud of you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Are You Data Driven!

Introduction   During survival training the commandoes are taught techniques to avoid starving when cut off from human habitats while operating in dense forests, unending deserts and snow-clad mountains due to enemy action. The basic principle is that human beings can consume everything that is eaten by mammals. Wild or unknown red-coloured fruits and plants that exude white juice should be considered poisonous and avoided. The commandoes are trained to catch and eat even snakes. The trick is to catch the snakes alive and remove their poisonous, rotten and harmful glands before killing them and preparing a delicious meal. Similarly, the data needs to be defanged before consuming, lest it dooms the user. It needs to be sifted, vetted, analysed and evaluated.   Information is power. Google’s mission statement is to “Organise the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful”. The ever evolving technology makes it possible to compile and process infinite infor...

ART OF IGNORING

    One day, when I was a Colonel and commanding a combat unit, I returned home very late for lunch. Although, physically back home for some food, my mind was still reeling with the stuff at work. I was unable to notice an old friend who had come on a surprise visit and was sitting in the lawn, chatting with my wife for the past two hours. He read my mind well and smiled. When my wife moved to the kitchen for laying the lunch, we got talking over the pre-lunch drinks.      My friend, also a senior colleague, explained that when we had joined the army twenty years back, as Second Lieutenants, ten men each were placed under our command. These men made one, two or three mistakes every day. The lapses were of simple nature like getting late for parade, untidy turnout, slouching or missing salutations. It was very intimate command. We noticed almost every lapse and were well trained to take corrective actions. Thus, at the end of the day, we were quite satisfied with...

MOTIVATIONAL MOTTOES

     I was ten years old when I joined Sainik School during Jan 1967. It was a boarding school with military like environment and discipline; all very different from the carefree living with the siblings, in the cosy comfort of parental care at home. Here, one had to fend for everything. Early to rise, a cup of tea, followed by physical training, then bath and change into uniform akin to the army, thereafter march to the mess in squads for breakfast, from there march-on to the academics block for classes and march back to the mess for lunch. There was a short rest period post lunch followed by games parade.  In the evenings we again took bath, wore mess dress and observed combined study period. The day concluded with marching for dinner to the mess and back to the hostel, polishing shoes and washing small garments before going to the beds at lights out till reveille early next day morning. There were intermittent doses of instructions and moral lectures everyday to m...